Archives

Reuters: EPA Scientists Find 2-BE in drinking water wells near drilling operations

Reuters: EPA Scientists Find 2-BE in drinking water wells near drilling operations reads in part: “Among the contaminants found in some of the wells was 2-butoyethanol, or 2-BE, a solvent used in natural gas extraction, which researchers say causes the breakdown of red blood cells, leading to blood in the urine and feces, and can damage the kidneys, liver, spleen and bone marrow.”

Fortuna Energy has refused to state for the record that this chemical 2-BE would NOT be a component of the chemicals to be injected into the Mallula test well in Van Etten. Help protect our water »

Safety, disposal of fracking fluid raise concerns

Read Gas-drilling companies keep chemical formulas a secret by Tom Wilber:

They have catchy names like Flomax 50, SandWedge WF and Bio Clear, but you won’t find them at the drug store, in the pro shop or among your household cleaners.

They are, in fact, trade names for caustic and flammable industrial agents used by crews drilling for natural gas. Mixed with millions of gallons of water and blasted into the ground under high pressure, they fracture bedrock and stimulate the flow of natural gas.

The process, called hydro-fracturing, is at the center of a debate over environmental risks associated with tapping the Marcellus Shale, a massive gas field running beneath the Southern Tier and throughout the Appalachian Basin.

Read the rest

Comment on the 2009 draft State Energy Plan

The 2009 draft State Energy Plan that was just released seems to be getting little public attention. The interim plan (March 2009) was developed after a number of hearings last winter and was focused on renewable sources. The interim plan was replaced on the website by the draft plan this week and has expanded coverage to all energy sources including development of the Marcellus Shale.

Pages 49-51 address natural gas development and quote the potential recoverable production that are prevalent in the industry publications but are now being questioned based on experience in the fully developed Barnett Shale. There are a lot of assumptions about the economic benefits of increased landowner wealth and tax collection although property taxes on gas production are extremely modest and NY presently has no severance tax on natural gas production. It does acknowledge concerns about the local impacts to communities, including increased truck traffic, noise, aesthetics, and impact on quality of life. Assumptions are made that environmental protection is fully satisfied by the DEC during the GEIS process.

The Ithaca Journal had an article on the Plan this week based on the Governor’s executive order and a press release. It also quotes environmental advocates.

There is a series of public meetings through Aug and Sept. (PDF) and a mid Oct. deadline for written comments with the final report due in November.

It seems to me that this deserves a high priority for all government officials and environmental advocates.

ACTION ALERT on gas drilling legislation

*** 6.8.09 UPDATE – URGENT ACTION ALERT ***

Now is the time to let Congress know that they must repeal the oil and gas industry’s expemtions from the Safe Drinking Water Act, and that they must include protections for private drinking wells. Call or fax your congressperson soon (there may be a vote as early as Tuesday 6/9/09). Industry is pressuring Congress now – so must we!!

* HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY & COMMERCE-NY MEMBERS:

Eliot L. Engel
Tel:(202)225-2464 Fax: (202)225-5513

Anthony D. Weiner
Tel:(202)225-6616

Committee Chair: Henry A. Waxman
Tel: (202)225-3976 Fax: (202)225-4099

*CONGRESSMEN:

Maurice Hinchey (22nd District) – Hinchey is a co-sponsor, but tell him to INCLUDE protection for private water wells too
Tel: (202)225-6335 Fax: (202)226-0774

Michael Arcuri (24th District)
Tel: (202)225-3665 Fax: (202)756-2472

Eric Massa (29th District)
Tel: (202)225-3161 Fax: (202)226-6599

The following letter was written by Susan Multer to send to friends across the country, many of whom know nothing about gas drilling. She welcomes our using it or revising it to send to our friends as well.

Dear Friends,

Very soon a bill will be introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives that is critical to our health. It will repeal the exemption given to the oil and gas industry in 2005 from the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (see below). Although the bill doesn’t have a number yet, the industry is already lobbying hard against it, saying any further regulation will cost jobs and make us more dependent on foreign oil. They fail to note that without this regulation our health is at stake.

The bill will be referred to the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce, members of which are listed below. If your state has one or more Representatives on that committee, your help is first needed to get the bill moved favorably out of committee and onto the floor of the House for a vote. Please fax a short letter to each committee member from your state as well as to your own Congressman/woman, urging co-sponsorship of the bill and pushing for its passage.

Those of you whose state has no one serving on the committee can go ahead and write your Representative now, asking for co-sponsorship of the pending bill to repeal the exemption. Letters sent by US mail take too long because they have to be checked for anthrax; emails may not get recorded or counted, plus they look like they are organization-generated. So please send a fax or make a phone call. A fact sheet from four major environmental organizations working on this issue is attached.

Please understand that unlike traditional vertical drilling, the high-pressure, horizontal hydraulic fracturing (aka hydrofracking) of shale, sandstone or coal beds requires, per well, hundreds of heavy trucks to carry millions of gallons of fresh water (never to be returned to its source) across county and town roads to a 3- to 5-acre well pad. Then chemicals (some toxic, including endocrine disruptors) are added to the fresh water and forced under very high pressure down the well to break up the formation to free the gas.

After the fracking is finished, much of the toxic waste stays underground where it can travel. Much comes up in even more toxic form because heavy metals and radon are picked up in the process. This “produced water” has often been pumped into open, plastic-lined evaporation pits which pollute the air 24/7 and pollute the soil and water when the plastic leaks or the pond floods. An alternative is to transport (with the risk of leaks and spills) the toxic waste to a dry well and inject it back into the ground for storage (and possible leaks). Traditional water treatment facilities cannot handle this industrial waste because the energy companies won’t reveal its contents. (The chemicals we know about are from samples taken after above-ground accidents out west).

Since the gas released from these formations is not under much pressure, diesel pumps may be run at the surface day and night, sounding like an idling semi-truck. Since hydrofracking can be repeated several times, the life of the well may be more than twenty years. While risk of air and water pollution increases, quality of life and resale value of property decrease, sometimes down to zero. Just ask a realtor in an area where leases have been signed.

If hydrofracking were as safe as the industry claims it is, there would be no need for an exemption, and repeal of it would not be of concern. What we are not being told is that there have been unacceptable levels of hydrogen sulfide in Alabama, ground-level ozone in the open spaces of Colorado, cattle dropping dead in Louisiana, industrialization of the landscape in Wyoming, a house blown off its foundation in Ohio, contamination of water wells in Pennsylvania and cases of fires in faucets, fish kills, goats and mares being unable to reproduce, people losing their hearing and some developing brain lesions. What links these tragedies together is that all have occurred on properties near hydraulic fracturing.

You can learn more from www.ogap.org, www.endocrinedisruption.org, and www.propublica.org/feature/natural-gas-politics-526. You can see interviews with people negatively affected at www.damascuscitizens.org. But you don’t have to in order to speak up on this subject. The bottom line is simply this: to not regulate the oil and gas industry the way all others are regulated with respect to the Safe Drinking Water Act is unconscionable. For the health and safety of everyone, please take action to repeal the exemption now.

ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005

Public Law 109-58
109th Congress

Title III — Oil and Gas

Subtitle C — Production

SEC. 322. HYDRAULIC FRACTURING.

Paragraph (1) of section 1421(d) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300h(d)) is amended to read as follows:

“(1) Underground injection.–The term ‘underground injection’–

“(A) means the subsurface emplacement of fluids by well injection; and

“(B) excludes–

“(i) the underground injection of natural gas for purposes of storage; and

“(ii) the underground injection of fluids or propping agents (other than diesel fuels) pursuant to hydraulic fracturing operations related to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities.

US House Committee on Energy and Commerce

AR Mike Ross

AZ John B. Shadegg

CA Lois Capps
Anna G. Eshoo
Jane Harman
Mary Bono Mack
Doris O. Matsui
Jerry McNerney
George Radanovich
Henry A. Waxman, Chair

CO Diana DeGette

CT Christopher S. Murphy

FL Kathy Castor
Cliff Stearns

GA John Barrow
Nathan Deal
Phil Gingrey

IA Bruce L. Braley

IL Bobby L. Rush
Jan Shakowsky
John Shimkus

IN Steve Buyer
Baron P. Hill

KY Ed Whitfield

LA Charlie Melancon
Steve Scalise
MA Edward J. Markey

MD John P. Sarbanes

MI John D. Dingell, Chair Emeritus
Mike Rogers
Bart Stupak
Fred Upton

MO Roy Blunt

NC G. K. Butterfield
Sue Wilkins Myrick

NE Lee Terry

NJ Frank Pallone, Jr.

NY Eliot L. Engel
Anthony D. Weiner

OH Zachary T. Space
Betty Sutton

OK John Sullivan

OR Greg Walden

PA Mike Doyle
Tim Murphy
Joseph R. Pitts

TN Marsha Blackburn
Bart Gordon

TX Joe Barton, Ranking Member
Michael C. Burgess
Charles Gonzalez
Gene Green
Ralph M. Hall

UT Jim Matheson

VA Rick Boucher

VI Donna M. Christensen

VT Peter Welch

WA Jay Inslee

WI Tammy Baldwin

Safe Drinking Water Act PDF

Faucets of Fire: The Science and Politics of Gas Drilling in New York

The League of Women Voters annual dinner meeting
Tinelli’s Hathaway House
A social hour with cash bar will begin at 6:00PM with dinner to follow at 6:30PM.

Program: Faucets of Fire: The Science and Politics of Gas Drilling in New York, Stanley R Scobie, PhD., Retired Professor, Binghamton University and Consultant on Gas Drilling Law. Dr. Scobie, member of the Binghamton League, has written a brief on Gas Drilling for the NYS League of Women Voters  as part of our Natural Resources agenda. He also wrote an op-ed for the Women’s Coalition series of voter issues published in the Cortland Standard prior to last fall’s election.   ?

Cost is $20.00, payable at the door (meal included).?Reservations will be needed by Friday, May 29. Please call Nancy Hansen at 607-756-8237 or Sharon Stevans at 607-756-7049.

"If we continue down this path, this area will be uninhabitable"

Eric Massa at a Town Hall Meeting in Benton by Loujane Johns:

When questioned about gas and oil leases, Massa described a meeting he had with geologists from Cornell?University. ‘If we continue down this path, this area will be uninhabitable. These are scientists who work in some of the most sophisticated labs in the United States. I am not an enemy of natural gas, but in the Southern Tier most of the gas is controlled by foreign companies. I think applying gas and oil to the Clean Water Act is necessary.’

Read more…

Fracking on NPR

Check out this segment by Jeff Brady on NPR: Face-off Over ‘Fracking’: Water Battle Brews On Hill (Click for an audio link and synopsis)